Re: Issues in PowerMail [message #858 is a reply to message #856] |
Thu, 28 March 2019 23:16   |
CTM info
Messages: 187 Registered: September 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello,
As mentioned previously, PowerMail is 32-bit only, and its IMAP implementation was lightweight by design.
Our own ISP has moved on to cancel TLS 1.0 support, so in order to continue using PowerMail we have moved on ISPs.
And when Apple drops support for 32-bit applications, we will continue to run PowerMail on 32-bit capable versions of macOS.
PowerMail is not on the cutting edge, but it does what it has always done in its uniquely efficient way… we are not representing suitability for any intent or purpose.
Regards,
jean michel/ctm qa
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 3:32 AM, 'C onstantin' via foxtrot-search wrote:
>
> Good evening,
>
> I wonder if there is any continuing development going on with PowerMail. Specifically, there are a number of areas that likely need help in the near future for the program to remain relevant.
>
> 1) Future Mac OS' beyond Mojave will no longer allow 32-bit applications.
> 2) Transport Layer Security (TLS) in PowerMail is stuck at 1.0 whereas the world has moved on. Even Sierra uses 1.2. Many ISPs are turning off TLS 1.0 support now (pair networks, for example) Long Term, POP downloads will no longer be possible for many users if TLS stays at 1.0. That in turn means that the lovely sorting we have gotten used to will no longer function also.
> 3) The IMAP implementation of PowerMail is quite simply weak. I hope that can be overhauled and made as robust as the POP3 functions that preceded it.
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foxtrot-search" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foxtrot-search+unsubscribe«~at~»googlegroups«|dot|»com .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
--
---
|
|
|